We have found the same thing to be true. The EPA National Stormwater Calculator is an excellent program (especially with its soil and rainfall information). It is great for conceptual plans. However, for detailed design, it is very limited.
A co-worker and I will be doing a presentation at StormCon in a couple of weeks regarding results using the EPA National Stormwater Calculator, the proposed State of Tennessee "Runoff Reduction Analysis Tool," and the City of Chattanooga LID calculator tool. The EPA program uses the SWMM engine, Tennessee uses the Kostiakov-Lewis method, and Chattanooga uses the "Small Storm Hydrology Method" by Dr. Robert Pitt. The different methods yield similar, but different results (as one would expect).
I look forward to seeing comments from others about their experience with the EPA National Stormwater Calculator.
-------------------------------------------
Tony Kinder P.E., P.L.S., M.ASCE
Engineering Manager
City of Chattanooga, Tennessee
(423)643-6022(423)643-6022 -------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-23-2014 20:55
From: Elizabeth Fassman
Subject: SWMM vs National Calculator?
What are folks' impressions regarding benefits vs drawbacks of using full SWMM vs the new EPA National Calculator? My general impression is that since the National Calculator incorporates a somewhat simplified version of SWMM, detailed design is limited... but for overall site planning it is probably OK and very handy(?) to have the automation of the National Calculator (ie links to the National Weather Service, soils and topography databases, etc.).
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
-------------------------------------------
Elizabeth Fassman Ph.D., A.M.ASCE
Stevens Institute of Technology
Hoboken NJ
(201)216-3549(201)216-3549
-------------------------------------------