Saludos! Dr. Guzman
I want to thank you for taking the time to review my research and for your encouraging words regarding its potential impact.
Your point about validation and transparency is well-taken. I agree that these data-driven tools must serve to inform, rather than replace, rigorous engineering judgment. I am currently revising my feasibility assessment to better address how these models can be realistically integrated into traditional frameworks.
Per your suggestion, I have already reached out to Dr. Carlos Arteta to discuss methodological choices and the limitation of these approaches. I look forward to learning from his expertise in structural damage identification.
Thank you again for your guidance and for supporting the next generation of Puerto Rican engineers.
Original Message:
Sent: 01-18-2026 09:43 PM
From: Andres Guzman
Subject: Student question: Using AI to help with bridge recovery for the people of Puerto Rico?
Dear Mark, your interest in addressing the structural vulnerability of bridges in Puerto Rico reflects both strong technical curiosity and a commendable commitment to public welfare.
The approach you describe-using machine learning techniques such as Random Forest models to support rapid screening or triage of infrastructure assets-is not only conceptually sound, but also aligned with current research trends in structural health monitoring and risk-informed decision-making. While such methods are not a replacement for detailed physics-based analyses, they are increasingly viewed as valuable tools for prioritization, especially in contexts where time, funding, and manpower are limited.
In this regard, I would like to point you to the work currently being developed by my colleague Dr. Carlos Arteta (<maskemail>carteta@...</maskemail>), who has been actively implementing and evaluating data-driven methodologies for structural damage identification and assessment. His experience may be particularly useful for you, both in terms of methodological choices and in understanding how these approaches can be realistically integrated with traditional engineering frameworks. I strongly encourage you to reach out to him to discuss possible alternatives and limitations relevant to your specific case.
The key challenge now is validation, transparency, and demonstrating that these tools can reliably inform-not replace-engineering decisions.
I wish you every success in your academic path and commend you for pursuing engineering solutions with real societal impact.
------------------------------
Andres Guzman D.Eng., MEng, Ing., F.ASCE
Associate Professor
UNIVERSIDAD DEL NORTE
Barranquilla
Original Message:
Sent: 01-15-2026 11:21 PM
From: Mark Gibbs
Subject: Student question: Using AI to help with bridge recovery for the people of Puerto Rico?
Hi everyone!
I'm a student member finishing my Associate's and transitioning to the University of Akron later this year. I'm a Phi Theta Kappa member, and in my free time, I enjoy playing chess and doing research to help me grow as a future engineer.
I've been looking into a major problem facing the people of Puerto Rico. The island's bridges have a D+ grade from ASCE. Because hurricanes happen every year, there is a constant cycle of damage. There is often not enough money or manpower to inspect every single bridge using complex simulations before the next storm hits. A 2024 U.S. GAO report shows the recovery is still struggling and costs are much higher than expected.
I'm trying to find a more strategic way to handle this. I've been reading research that suggests Random Forest (a type of machine learning) can be used to "triage" bridges in minutes instead of hours.
Here is the idea I'm looking at:
AI Triage: Using a Random Forest model to quickly flag which bridges are at high risk of washing away. This is much faster than doing a full physics simulation (FSI) for every single bridge.
Smart Construction: Since money is tight for many municipalities, faster and cheaper construction methods could be used for the bridges the AI identifies as high-risk so that local communities don't get hit as hard financially.
I'm just a student, so I'd really appreciate some help from the engineers here:
Does this actually sound doable in the real world, or is it too "out there" for agencies like FEMA or a local DOT?
Are there cheaper bridge designs you've seen work well against coastal waves that a small town could actually afford?
This hits very close to home for me. I am Puerto Rican and lived on the island from the age of five until 9th grade. I have seen firsthand what happens every year during hurricane season; one of those storms actually destroyed my house. I really want to find a way to help the communities back home stay safe.
Any advice or direction you can give a future Akron Zip would be awesome!
Supporting Research & Data:
https://2021.infrastructurereportcard.org/state-item/puerto-rico/ - 2019 Puerto Rico Infrastructure Report Card
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141029615004356?via%3Dihub - Fragility surrogate models for coastal bridges in hurricane prone zones
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383691493_Structural_analysis_of_the_economy_of_Puerto_Rico_after_the_elimination_of_Section_936_A_network-based_approach - Structural analysis of the economy of Puerto Rico after the elimination of Section 936: A network-based approach
Puerto Rico Disasters: Progress Made, but the Recovery Continues to Face Challenges
------------------------------
Mark Gibbs S.M.ASCE
Student
Massillon OH
------------------------------