While I'm unsure of your local regulations, some jurisdictions view stormwater differently depending on source. For example, in Washington State, runoff from vehicle space and chemically-treated landscaping is viewed as pollution-generating, which requires water quality treatment in addition to flow control; whereas runoff from other hard surfaces (e.g., rooftops) is considered non-pollution generating and requires only flow control.
Given the rooftop use as a dog park, that space would fall into the pollution-generating category, requiring water quality treatment. Perhaps you could do something like a "modular wetland", sand filter, or similar. And of course, source control in the form of signage, public outreach to tenants, and bag dispensers and trash receptacles couldn't hurt.
------------------------------
Eric Pilcher P.E., M.ASCE
Bonney Lake, WA
eric.pilcher@...------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-30-2018 16:04
From: Sara DeGroot
Subject: Rooftop Dog Park Runoff
We're starting to see plans calling for AstroTurf rooftop dog parks and are running into a bit of a conundrum when it comes to treating this runoff. This particular example is going on the 6th floor of a new development building and runoff is designed to be directed into roof drains (as per the norm for buildings). We are skeptical about this going into the sanitary system because it would contain large amounts of rain water, the pipe is only a 12-inch and we don't want to overwhelm the system. We don't really want that running into the storm system untreated either. Technically, ground level dog parks aren't treated either (but they do get some overland flow/natural ground cover treatment).
Has anyone run into this kind of issue before or have any ideas of where we can look for a solution?
------------------------------
Sara DeGroot ENV SP, P.E., M.ASCE
CIVIL ENGINEER III
Alexandria VA
------------------------------