What a great question. I'd like to broaden and ground it a little bit.
I've spent the last 10 years studying engineering of infrastructure supported by permafrost in some of the most rural areas of Alaska and Canada. The only infrastructure available to these communities is a runway. That is how they get their food, goods, get transported to hospitals, have sports competitions, see branches of their family, and interact with their government. Some can get barge shipments of goods on a yearly basis. One piece of very fragile infrastructure, in some areas it is supported more by ice than anything else. Some of these communities still do not have running water in their homes, nor sewer systems, mostly rural Alaska.
How we can make these communities more connected, safer, sustainable and resilient now and in light of a changing climate? I've been working to use the concept of "Risk", probability multiplied by consequence, to try to find objective measures of ranking infrastructure for repair so we prioritize the riskiest areas. But in these regions, the social and historical contexts of colonization are still impacting people.
So don't just think about the infrastructure and its engineering but the impact of that infrastructure on creating, resilient, safer, sustainable, dynamic communities everywhere. What does the community want/need, not what do politicians think they want? How can you use your influence as an engineer to make that happen?
Think broader.
------------------------------
Heather Brooks P.E.,M.ASCE
Geotechnical and Arctic Engineer
BGC Engineering Inc.
Edmonton AB
------------------------------