I have gone through the different replies and they contain insightful suggestions.
In my opinion reusing the destroyed/dismantled materials in different new structures may not prove a wise decision. There may be more than one reason for that. First, the materials lack bearing strength compared to fresh aggregates, which is most important for new structures, second, even if they are used for filling, transportation to the new construction site may not be cost effective.
The materials may be used and prove cost effective for subbase filling in roads and pavements, filling in building floors, railways embankments, airports and dry filled gravity dams.
Hope you have some ideas on how to best use the available materials!
------------------------------
Peter Singh M.ASCE
Managing Director
Kingdom Designers
Birganj
9779855020043
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-11-2018 15:10
From: Len Andersen
Subject: Recycling of ruined structure in Syria
New study is my recommendation. Doha in Qatar had about two square km of buildings similar to seen on TV flattened and recycled about 7 years ago. It was a salted dune sand concrete problem.
------------------------------
www.gasturbineandersen.com Len Andersen at Turbo Expo Norway June Engineer
Water Swirled Gas Turbine Technology
New York NY 10116-1529
(914)536-7101
Engineer - Gas Turbine Welding CWI
+ 20 yrs experience
len@...
914-536-7101
800-428-4801Len
Original Message:
Sent: 07-08-2018 02:38
From: Baraa Zaitoun
Subject: Recycling of ruined structure in Syria
I want to ask, how useful is it to make a new study for giving new data for the recycling destroyed structure in Syria for reconstruction? Should I make a new study or go to the previous analysis and similar tests previously done?
And how valuable is it to be a study for a scientific paper for research purpose?
------------------------------
Baraa Zaitoun S.M.ASCE
------------------------------