I'm glad that you raised the issue of re post-tensioning. It reminds me of a similar procedure in a different kind of structure: In 1978, I had a problem when the roof girders of Zayed Sports City deviated 11 mm (4 3/8") sideways preventing us from erecting the cylindrical shells above. Those segmental precast, counter-cast girders were post-tensioned with 200 tonnes/tendon by the top French firm in the field. So it was a surprise to see such an anomaly. It turned out that it was caused by differential EC between the two sides of those H-shaped girders, due to differential exposure to the sun.
To rectify it, I increased the PT on one side of the girder, just enough to fit the shells above, leaving enough tolerance gap for overshooting due to future creep. Thank God it wasn't grouted yet.
It was like directing a horse sideways by differential pull of the harness.
But I have a lingering concern: with repeated PT; wedges digging their teeth in the strands, any adverse long term effects?
------------------------------
Neil Kazen, M.Eng., M.Sc., P.Eng.
FASCE, FCPCI, FEC,
Retired Structural Engineering Manager, Transportation Division, SNC-Lavalin
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-30-2018 07:54
From: Allen Hulshizer
Subject: How does the pre-stressing force transmit in post-tensioning beams/slabs?
Actually this is a general comment regarding Post-Tensioning [PT].
In Nuclear Containment PT construction there is a requirement to check the existing tension load at given periods.
Also, from time to time the PT is released and a section of the wall removed for Steam-Generator replacement and then Re-tensioned.
In a number of cases, when the large wall section has been removed, significant delamination has been discovered. Crystal River was shut down as a result of not being able to resolve the further delamination when re-tensioned.
Any comments on the delamination occurrence and a solution?
------------------------------
Allen Hulshizer P.E., F.ASCE, FACI
Consulting Structural Engineer
Chalfont PA
(215)8872838
Original Message:
Sent: 08-29-2018 11:32
From: David Thompson
Subject: How does the pre-stressing force transmit in post-tensioning beams/slabs?
I would agree with your concern about transferring tensioning force through friction with large tendons. You just have to look at slippage of strands in pre-stressing after the strands are cut.
There are grouted ducts used in slabs where strands or small tendons are used that my statement would apply.
Our firm has not used unbonded post-tensioning since the 1990's. Our concern was the sensitivity of the tensioning system to construction methods and quality leading to corrosion, but that is a different topic
------------------------------
David Thompson P.E., M.ASCE
Principal
KTA Structural Engineers Ltd.
Calgary AB
(403) 246-8827
Original Message:
Sent: 08-28-2018 12:27
From: Neil Kazen
Subject: How does the pre-stressing force transmit in post-tensioning beams/slabs?
I'm concerned with the statement, "and if the tendons break the effect of the breakage is localized to the area of the break. The grouting in the tubes allow the force from the tendons to transfer through the grout and then the duct into the concrete. "
What's the development length for a tendon with 200 tonnes (440 kips) PT? How about 900 tonnes (2000 kips), my heaviest PT to date?
Further, in a tendon of several strands, not all strands are in full touch with the grout.
------------------------------
Neil Kazen F.ASCE
Structural Design Manager Transportation Division
Toronto ON
Original Message:
Sent: 08-27-2018 11:09
From: David Thompson
Subject: How does the pre-stressing force transmit in post-tensioning beams/slabs?
You are correct that unbonded post-tensioning has forces transferred through wedge action. This is also true for bonded post tensioning. The bonding does several things, provides protection to the tendons and if the tendons break the effect of the breakage is localized to the area of the break. The grouting in the tubes allow the force from the tendons to transfer through the grout and then the duct into the concrete. The transfer of stressing forces from a broken tendon through the bonded duct is similar to the a pre-stress strand into concrete.
------------------------------
David Thompson P.E., M.ASCE
Principal
KTA Structural Engineers Ltd.
Calgary AB
(403) 246-8827
Original Message:
Sent: 08-24-2018 06:56
From: Muhannad Husain
Subject: How does the pre-stressing force transmit in post-tensioning beams/slabs?
Thank you so much for the valuable comments. I may conclude that:
-post-tensioned members basically do transfer stresses by means of wedge actions in end zones, regardless the adoption of bonded or unbonded tendons.
-grouting is introduced in bonded tendons as a way of protection only.
Am I right?
Since the difference between bonded and unbonded is the grout injection, does that mean for two identical beams (same material properties, same prestress applied, etc, but one with bonded and the other with unbonded tendons) the stress distribution and prestress transfer would be nearly the same and follow the same trend?
------------------------------
Muhannad Husain S.M.ASCE
Researcher
Hohai University
Nanjing
86183 51933411
Original Message:
Sent: 08-17-2018 14:14
From: Muhannad Husain
Subject: How does the pre-stressing force transmit in post-tensioning beams/slabs?
It's known that for the pre-tensioned members, the tendons are stressed first and soon the concrete is placed which leads to a (what I call) perfect bonding between the tendon and the surrounding concrete. This achieved bonding is the main key to transfer the stresses. In case of post-tensioning, the tendon is placed through ducts and stressed later after the concrete is poured, which means there's no bond (at least not a perfect one) between the tendon and concrete. So how would the pre-stress transmission work here? I understand that for bonded tendons the grout will help in building that friction between the two surfaces and hence transferring the stresses, but what about the un-bonded ones? Why would we use the un-bonded system?
------------------------------
Muhannad Husain S.M.ASCE
Researcher
Hohai University
Nanjing
+86 183 5193 3411
------------------------------