Alexander
I am unfamiliar with the ASCE 113 standard but observe that these load combinations (posted in your email) use somewhat load factors on D and other loads, as compared to ASCE 7 as well as the reduced wind speed. Both the loads and load combinations specified in ASCE 7 have been calibrated to provide the target reliabilities indicated in Section 1.3 of the Standard. I am unaware of the reliabilities targeted by ASCE 113, however, the use of reduced loads and load factors relative to ASCE 7 suggests that lower reliability (higher probability of failure) is targeted by the ASCE 113 standard. If one were to use ASCE 7 wind loads rather than W300, together with the ASCE 113 load combinations, the resulting structure would have higher reliability (for wind-induced failure) but less than that targeted by the ASCE 7 standard. It is impossible to say how much higher this reliability would be without conducting extensive studies. I would say in response to your question that is possible and should be permissible to use the ASCE 7 wind speeds with the ASCE 113 standard. This will result in improved structural performance to an undetermined extent.
------------------------------
Ronald Hamburger, SE
Consulting Principal
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger
------------------------------