Risk Management

Can aging dams withstand the pressure until sufficient funding for rehabilitation is secured?

  • 1.  Can aging dams withstand the pressure until sufficient funding for rehabilitation is secured?

    Posted an hour ago
      |   view attached

     According to the ASCE Infrastructure Report Card (2025), the dam sector received a grade of D+, reflecting a fragile structural situation: more than 92,000 dams nationwide, with an average age of 64 years, including 17,000 classified as high‑hazard potential, and over 2,500 already in poor or unsatisfactory condition. The report stresses that urgent maintenance is essential to prevent catastrophic risks.

    At the same time, the report highlights broad climatic factors - such as extreme rainfall, recurring floods, and rare hydrological events - which are increasingly exerting pressure on aging dams beyond their original design capacity.

    To connect these broad climatic factors mentioned in the report with observed realities on the ground, I analyzed summer (JJA) runoff data from NASA's FLDAS satellite system using the FLDASNOAH01CGLM v001 model covering the period 1982–2026 shown in chart below:

    This chart emphasizes how convective rainfall, thunderstorms, and monsoon systems drive widespread runoff during summer, making JJA the most representative season for nationwide hydrologic stress comparisons. It provides long‑term evidence of climate extremes that directly challenge the resilience of aging dam infrastructure.

    The attached chart (Interannual Summer Runoff Variability) clearly shows fluctuations and an overall increasing trend in summer runoff, driven by convective storms and monsoon rainfall. This confirms that climate extremes are not theoretical projections but recurring, scientifically documented realities.  

    This linkage between the report's findings and field‑observed data strengthens the argument: urgent maintenance and rehabilitation  are not optional but necessary, and any delay in funding multiplies risks for downstream communities and interconnected infrastructure.

    .............................

    The critical question remains: what can engineers do now to safeguard critical infrastructure?

    In my view, and until adequate rehabilitation funding is secured, we can adapt the ALARP principle as a temporary preventive measure, by operating dams within a defined Operational Safety Envelope, including:  

    - Enhanced monitoring and surveillance  

    - Early activation of emergency action plans  

    - Reducing operational loads when extreme climatic events are forecast  

    This adaptation does not solve the structural problem permanently, but it reduces risks to the lowest level reasonably practicable, providing an additional protective layer for communities and infrastructure facing escalating climate extremes.

    Importantly, this approach aligns directly with the report's emphasis on Risk‑Informed Decision Making (RIDM). ALARP can be seen as a practical extension of RIDM, ensuring risks are kept within tolerable limits until full rehabilitation becomes possible.

    Based on observations, this phenomenon occurred around the globe, and affected most aging dams: so what ideas can engineers explore now to prevent aging dams from collapsing into catastrophic failures?



    ------------------------------
    Abubakr Gameil, R. ENG, M. ASCE®️,
    MSc-Holder, [ SEI, EWRI, CI, ISSMGE ]Mermber
    Past / Chairman & Director General
    Almanassa Engineering International Co. Ltd,
    Khartoum, Sudan
    Currently / UAE- Humanitariam Residency
    NXN- Central branch -Al Fujairah,
    PO.Box : 1142 (Fujairah)
    ------------------------------

    Attachment(s)

    pdf
    Dams.pdf   8.70 MB 1 version