The Source article is a good read, Mitch. I like the cited Smart Management book cover image. It starts with fuzzy entangled circles that yield to a single circle when things become clear – when management direction becomes clear. It's like the fuzzy quantum state waves that collapse into a single particle when measured (The Quantum World).
As I see it (in Uncertainty and Risk), The highest types of uncertainties are heuristics and rules-of-thumb used by individuals and groups to make judgement when no firm information is available.
And uncertainty (in The World of Numbers and Chances), Uncertainty is simply the lack of surety or absolute confidence in something.
Heuristics, uncertainty and risk are not mutually exclusive. Risk is related to uncertainty via the probability of occurrence of an uncertain but probable event.
Heuristics has its uses and abuses:
Whose heuristics is it? Obviously, an experienced person by accumulating many years of experiences develop valuable intuition on certain areas of his or her works in comparison to a relatively inexperienced person. Therefore, his or her heuristics carries lots of weight, but no true proponent of heuristics could claim that his or her opinion or decision is final, just based on heuristics. Rather, any such opinion is a direction setter asking for follow-ups to finalize things. If the heuristics is right – it saves time and cost, if not, it may end up being a waste.
In the East, at the world's second earliest university at Nalanda (5th to 12th century CE) a theory of completion of knowledge is developed (highlighted in The Quantum World). It says knowledge is complete through the processes of: anumana (concept or idea) → pratyaka (analytical rationalizing of the idea) → pramana (actual verification of the idea). This theory, whether we realize or not, basically forms the foundation of any modern investigation and decision.
Heuristics about what? Again, in a similar vein one can see that – a heuristics in the case of a relatively small project or at a preliminary level of a large project may carry lots of weight than others. No serious management decision of a large project can rely entirely on heuristics – this is just the common sense. This is because the variables and conditions of some experiences – may not exactly corroborate with another.
As one can understand – the risk associated with the probable failure of a such project could be staggering. And a decision based on heuristics alone can neither be justified nor defended.
Dilip
---------
Dr. Dilip K Barua, Ph.D
Website Links and Profile
Original Message:
Sent: 11-01-2024 03:38 PM
From: Mitchell Winkler
Subject: Who can tell us more about Fast-and-Frugal Heuristics?
Has anyone in this space read "Could your decision-making skills use some honing? Authors offer smart approach headlined in the Source on Tuesday, October 26 and could you tell us more about fast-and-frugal heuristics - the underlying strategy promoted by the authors?
------------------------------
Mitch Winkler P.E.(inactive), M.ASCE
Houston, TX
------------------------------