Indeed minimalist principle (or
less of things) of thinking and problem-solving is an attractive alternative – if it works or if one manages to live with it. In religion – Buddhist and Christian monks and nuns vow to live on the minimum required – with the understanding that the more one craves – the more becomes the entanglement of unhappiness.
Minimalist principle has another attractive name
Simplicity. We hear time and again – to see a problem in simple terms – breaking it down to fundamentals – once achieved a problem unfolds itself – opening the vista of alternative solutions. I have tried to point that out in the introductory paragraph of
Artificial Intelligence – the Tool of No Limit – quoting Krishnamurti (1895 – 1986). And we should not forget, what the Giant (Albert Einstein; 1879 – 1955) of the giants said:
everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.
In engineering of technical solutions of a particular problem – I would rather begin by asking:
• Are the available infos or tools – as minimum or
less as they may be – adequate?
• Have they been successfully applied in the past for similar cases?
• Am I confident that they are enough for me to defend the solution I propose?
If the answers to the above questions are
yes then one should feel satisfied to pursue a method –
whatever the name of that method might be. But, we should not forget that the horizon of knowledge is continuously expanding – exploring uncharted territories. Therefore what was adequate in the past – may not satisfy one's requirement or awareness at present.
-----
Dilip
WebsiteORCID IDGoogle Scholar------------------------------
Dr. Dilip Barua, Ph.D, P.Eng, M. ASCE
Vancouver, BC, Canada
https://widecanvas.weebly.com------------------------------