This is indeed an interesting discussion. I concur with many of the thoughts stated in this thread about the need for titles to adjust based upon a situation. Given the stringency around this profession, it is very confusing and albeit an
illusionary construct. I'm reminded of an ASCE ethics opinion regarding a former member's use of the P.E. designation in email signatures and/or business cards while traveling out of state for conferences (though not licensed in all states in which he traveled - if I recall correctly the member was cited with an ethics violation and left the society), as well as a 2019 ruling from the Oregon Court system regarding the use of the term "Engineer".
From the Oregon ruling:
"the court opines that the word engineer has "no fixed meaning," much like the term specialist. Moreover, it says, even if an unlicensed person's use of the term could potentially be misleading, the court nonetheless finds that Oregon's complete ban on such uses is "more burdensome than necessary to protect the public from the unlicensed practice of engineering." Source:
https://www.asce.org/question-of-ethics-articles/feb-2019/From the ASCE ethics article: Because a business card can be viewed both as a statement of credentials and as an advertisement for business, the crucial test under ASCE's Code of Ethics is whether the member's use of the P.E. designation on the card is in any way misleading. Under certain circumstances, the use of the P.E. designation on a business card, while truthful in some respects, may give rise to an ethics violation if it creates the false impression that a member is licensed in a state in which he or she is not in fact licensed Source:
https://www.asce.org/question-of-ethics-articles/nov-2007/Personally, Because I choose not to pursue licensing as a PE and instead pursued state construction licensing. I find myself going to extraordinary measures to avoid the use of the term engineer - though commonplace for friends and family to refer to me as one. I correct them with a smug smile "engineering management!" I say. :). They laugh but I am serious. Because that is what my Graduate degrees are and because that is what the confusion around the title demands if one is to err on the side of caution.
When I engage in STEM outreach (of which I am passionate) It's a bit awkward when asked "are you in science" (well, sort of but probably not like you think. but I do have a PhD), "are you an engineer (not licensed, but I work within that industry). Add in that my current day to day has more to do with contracts, schedules, and money, and research than technical design (though design is an integral part of my day, the technical is largely left to others). It makes for a bit of crisis of identity doesn't it?
Today, when I'm asked, I say simply my passion is to create environments where people want to be. Most people don't care about specificity.
------------------------------
Jesse Kamm PhD, PMP, A.M.ASCE
Senior Vice President of Construction Management
------------------------------