Mr. Winkler,
The Committee on Geographic Units is part of the Leader Training Committee that is focused on providing training opportunities to improve the effectiveness of ASCE's Geographic based units leaders (Sections, Branches, and Region Governors). Identifying the training needs is done through various interactions with the local leadership and observations of gaps through review of reports and meetings.
------------------------------
Mario Ricozzi P.E., ENV SP, F.ASCE
Board Member
Regional Water Authority
Branford CT
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-16-2025 11:56 AM
From: Mitchell Winkler
Subject: Proposed Changes to ASCE Governance - Ask the Committee
Thanks for your response.
Could you please clarify the intent here? Do you mean training for the geographic units (e.g., to improve their effectiveness) or that the geographic units should focus on training (e.g., skill and knowledge building within the geographic unit)
Key to success is proper training, and efforts are underway to adjust that effort by re-establishing the Committee on Geographic Units to focus on training.
------------------------------
Mitch Winkler P.E.(inactive), M.ASCE
Houston, TX
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-16-2025 10:44 AM
From: Mario Ricozzi
Subject: Proposed Changes to ASCE Governance - Ask the Committee
Winkler:
Thank you for your questions and comments. We agree that making any size Board work effectively is a challenge. This Reframing is a continuance of a discussion and journey that started about 25 years ago when the Board was 27 directors. At that time, the smaller districts of ASCE were regrouped into somewhat larger geographic regions. The region structure allowed issues facing the Board to be brought to the Region Governors, who are closer to the membership and could provide relevant feedback. The Society Directors were still needing to wear two hats. One hat is the Corporate Board Director, challenged with keeping the corporation focused on the members and looking at the future of the profession and how the future may affect our members. The second hat is being the Chair of the geographic region from where they were elected. This promotes the further development of the governors and future Society Directors by giving them more opportunities for leadership. The new structure will allow the smaller group of Society Directors to focus on the future (strategic) and give more administrative duties to the Regions who can then approve and implement changes within their region. Key to success is proper training, and efforts are underway to adjust that effort by re-establishing the Committee on Geographic Units to focus on training. There have also been discussions of some higher level training opportunities for Board Members. Having a smaller size Board, with an additional level of leadership experience, will allow for better interaction around the table and a creation of the Geographic Board of Governors, will allow for sharing of information and ideas closer to the regions and members.
------------------------------
Mario Ricozzi P.E., ENV SP, F.ASCE
Board Member
Regional Water Authority
Branford CT
Original Message:
Sent: 12-14-2025 10:18 PM
From: Mitchell Winkler
Subject: Proposed Changes to ASCE Governance - Ask the Committee
What drove the decision to reduce the board from 18 to 12 members? Specific examples could help others who sit on or manage boards.
What are the different outcomes you expect to see with the new board size? This would help determine whether the new board is working as planned.
What is done or planned by way of training and coaching? Ditto for how priorities are established. In my experience, making boards work effectively is challenging.
------------------------------
Mitch Winkler P.E.(inactive), M.ASCE
Houston, TX