No argument with this initiative.
I would ask that you consider involving non-engineers, professionals, to help better understand why,
after adequate advance warning of similar natural disasters are forecasted, and warnings issued through areas
believed to be at risk, so many people still either:
a.
"Let's wait to see if this will really happen here,"b.
"What don't we just board over some windows and have a "Movie Fest."c.
"After all, we've been here over 21 years, and heard similar so-called warnings, and see? We're still here?"Given we promised to protect the safety, health, and welfare of the population,
perhaps its time we add-on the non-engineering hazards as well.
Cheers,
Bill
------------------------------
William M. Hayden Jr., Ph.D., P.E., CMQ/OE, F.ASCE
Buffalo, N.Y.
"It is never too late to be what you might have been." -- George Eliot 1819 - 1880
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-03-2022 09:01 AM
From: Stacey Morris
Subject: Hurricane Ian - Opportunity to Learn
I agree, Mitch. Civil Engineers are primary drivers in the development of building codes and we need to evaluate the damage from Ian and see what we could have done better. If not us, then who?
------------------------------
Stacey Morris P.E., M.ASCE
ETI Corporation
West Memphis AR
------------------------------