I totally disagree that you have to be a "generalist" in a public sector & "technologist" in a private sector job. You should guide your career and can make any job as "technical" as you want even at "manager, city director, or even a owner of a company level". To say all public sector employees don't do "technical" work would be a total falsehood. Many public agencies do their own in-house design construction plans, modeling, and even construction, etc. Few consultants can claim they do complete projects, all the way from platting to final acceptance of a building. Many cities however, will do this because their in house staff has this expertise.
I highly recommend every engineer who graduates that they work both sides of the fence, or you never understand how the other side works. How do consultants do budgets? How do pubic sectors fund or select projects? It is a symboitic relationship among engineers and other professionals. You need to be knowledgeable of both sides to be able to be sucessful for your "client". Your "client" can be a developer, contractor, or other agency if you work private side. Or if you are "public side" your client is the City Manager, Council, or other public agency head you work for that you must answer to regarding the consulting engineer's cost, time schedule and actions. Understanding how each other functions properly is critical to the successful career of both.
Bottom line, I've had "private" consultants come work for me as a "public" sector boss who told me that public sector was much harder than private sector. The work load and technical challenges isn't always a piece of cake if you are asked to "work" no matter what side of the fence you sit on.
------------------------------
Cissy Sylo P.E, CFM., M.ASCE,
President
CES Consulting Group
Carrollton TX
(214)717-3279
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 02-01-2017 12:34
From: James Gunter
Subject: Changing jobs - private to public sector
When I was in graduate school, I had a professor for a public works management course who explained that engineers fit into two categories, "technocrats" and "generalists". We all begin our engineering careers as "technocrats". At some point in our careers, we come to a fork in the road. Those who are leaders and have a desire to advance into management become "generalists". Those who are content to continue to pursue purely technical interests remain "technocrats". There is no offense to being either one, both are necessary. A few years ago I read a book titled THE PLATEAUING TRAP, by Judith Barwick, Ph. D. By coincidence, the book was written about the engineering profession and addressing the dilemma many engineers face at some point in their career regarding burnout. In my own career, I spent sixteen years in private consulting as a "technocrat" and then I redirected to public service as a "generalist" where I have been for the past twenty-nine years.. This book explains that only about 2% of the jobs in consulting lead to management opportunities. Regarding how to stay technically proficient, that is why many states have now mandated continuing education as a requirement for maintaining professional licensure.