We have young engineers do drafting, Cadd and other "non-project management" things because young engineers need to understand the whole project in order to be able to explain to what you want designed, drawn and calculated. I have found that if they do not have 2 projects worth of CADD, they cannot speak to the operators intelligently enough to be able to explain that the line type is too thick, or how to create a surface, or which surfaces they need to look at when calculating the net balance. They also do not understand what the implications are of the decision to move the centerline 3 feet east without changing the section.
Personally, I believe that young engineers should spend 2-3 months as an administrative person so that they understand how a contract is put together, where the files are, and how to get something out of them.
Project management will come better when the technical aspects of the system are understood. After all, how do you budget time for the CADD production of a project if your CADD guy says I don't know, and you have no clue either.
Its the same reason we start engineering with calculus, rather than Laplace transforms. It makes it seem less like magic.
As to which software, it doesn't much matter, cause 2 years from now, they should not be directly using any of it. If you are looking for a specific job, with specific requirements, demonstrate proficiency by doing a project of some type.
------------------------------
Dwayne Culp Ph.D., P.E., P.Eng, M.ASCE
Culp Engineering, LLC
Richmond TX
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 04-29-2017 07:40
From: Daniel Cook
Subject: Autocad, Microstation, and Revit
Why are we having Engineering Interns doing technician work? We should be training them to be engineers rather than technicians.