Just reviewed the paper Mitch, and most of its nuclear jargon, for me, is like "Speaking & Understanding" a foreign language . . . BUT… the jewel if offers us non-nuke folks is nicely laid out in the paper's table "Appendix."
It lists a risk-categorization level alongside listed risks that are about 93.67% of what almost all of our non-nuke projects face.
It might be useful for someone to sort out that appendix's issues most common to our non-nuke projects. Then share that adaptation herein.
By way of example, I offer the attached paper[1] as well which has some 40+ risk issues common to our non-nuke projects.
Stay Healthy!
Cheers,
How To Transform Failure Into Success-Forensic Management[1]
------------------------------
William M. Hayden Jr., Ph.D., P.E., CMQ/OE, F.ASCE
Buffalo, N.Y.
"It is never too late to be what you might have been." -- George Eliot 1819 - 1880
------------------------------