An ASCE membership login is required to participate in discussion forums and ASCE Mentor Match. Interested in becoming an ASCE member? Join Now. Need to renew? Renew Now.
RTR . . .The first time and every time lead directly to maximizing productivity.
i.e., WHAT you do.
i.e., HOW you do it.
Possible Outcomes . . . based on the activities of a group of people:
Now, please read the attached paper to consider how to move your people's results more frequently to RTR!
When employees were encouraged to base decision-making on organizational values and standards, favorable ethics outcomes multiplied 11 times. - [...]resources that do not need to be directed toward investigating and punishing unethical behavior or defending non-compliance can, instead, be applied to maximizing productivity.
Engineering Knowledge is necessary, but not sufficient to achieve project success.™
-W. M. Hayden Jr.
Q. What impacts your annual productivity results?
 Do the Right Things Right, each and every time.
 Effective X Efficient = Productivity
 Paper attached.
The linkage between ethics and compliance and productivity makes good intuitive sense, besides what the data show. Ethics and compliance is also important for ensuring a 'license to operate'. This was was borne out in the Enron debacle. It's Ironic that Enron had such a well-regarded ethics and compliance policy yet the top leadership threw ethics to the wind. It suggests that leadership actions and behaviors might be most important at the end of day.
Two additional factors that are at the top of my mind for driving productivity are well developed work processes and a commercial mindset. Work processes can provide a systematic approach to problem solving and mitigate wasted resources and wasted time and a commercial mindset keeps the focus on the end in mind and the bottom line.
Thanks for the insights, Mitch. As you might imagine, because I’ve had different experiences I have some different perspectives.
Mitch, I would not consider this point in and of itself, by no means a "Might be." In my opinion, it is the #1 root cause of why annual profits in so very many of our design engineering firms are commonly well below initial budgeted objectives.
Part of this common result can be linked to the executive's actions and behaviors becoming visible and vocal well after the project's metrics are demonstrably down.
"Treating "Common Causes" as "Special Causes" will continue to waste
your time, money, and frustrate your best people."
For clarity, we know that all of the people below the executive level work within the system of management planned, designed, managed, and resourced by the executive level. Everyone else works within that system.
So, one has to consider why our well-educated, experienced women and men at the level of program and project managers, department heads, and those within such groups appear either unable or unwilling to go directly to their senior and executive managers right after their initial "Project Start-up Session" discussions and tell their leadership. . .out loud and in writing:
"We do not have the required money, time, and resources
to deliver what the contract requires!"
This aberrant common group behavior between the executive and project working level is as common as the poor financial results historically have shown.
"Engineering and technology are important, but not sufficient to deliver successful projects."™
-W. M. Hayden Jr.
Thanks for the insights, Mitch. As you might imagine, because I've had different experiences I have some different perspectives.