I'd say that b) is the simple and natural way to approach this, basically because we are talking about weight, no soil particles friction, in many cases like passive pressure, soil might be taken off the equation thinking in the worst case scenario so actually in this situation I usually use case b) for soil bearing capacity and no soil for uplift and sliding.
LUIS A. SANCHEZ, P.E., M.ASCE
33154, Miami. Florida.
------------------------------
Luis Sanchez P.E., M.ASCE
Civil Engineer/Structural Engineer
Bay Harbor Islands FL
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 02-21-2018 02:08
From: Bruce Montgomerie
Subject: Weight of soil acting on a shallow foundation
Normally (b) would be used.
------------------------------
[Bruce [Montgomerie] M.ASCE
Design Engr
GLOUCESTER [AUSTRALIA]
Bruce
Original Message:
Sent: 02-20-2018 11:30
From: Krishna Ghimire
Subject: Weight of soil acting on a shallow foundation
Hello, I am seeking your insights on how to calculate the weight of soil acting on a foundation. There are different opinions on what portion of the soil above the footing should be accounted, for example, to calculate uplift resistance. Fig. (a) through (c) show different boundaries of soil assumed to exert weight on the footing. Fig. (c) is consistent with the weight of a wall considered when designing window lintels (i.e, not all wall weight is assumed to go on the lintel). Please suggest the angle of inclination as appropriate. Your valuable thoughts are highly appreciated.

------------------------------
Krishna Ghimire
------------------------------