Souissan,
Thank you for you response. Didn't see you response earlier. We do need more women engineers. There are a few women architects. In my opinion, most of the early work in the area has to concentrate on materials science aspects. Without a reliable, well understood material no real structure design is possible.
We are starting work on the life cycle analysis and thermal (hygrothermal and radiant) performance currently to clarify WHY you'd take the time to deal with the material system. The HOW of structural engineering and reliability follows. IMHO seismic application is way down the line though there is some work going on on the subject. In many parts of the world earthen building is just a fact of life.
Soils are of course very complex and varied. Developing clarity in properties of the constituent materials, stabilization (if any), and block or wall make are, in my opinion, currently rather rudimentary compared to just about every other material system in use in the developed world. There are a number of very good starts in codes and standards (Germany, France, and New Zealand for instance) but there is still much that need to be done. Looking back at the development of concrete as what is today taken to be a reliable material, Earthen Materials are only a bit behind concrete technology of about 100 years ago. We take that long development history for granted today.
------------------------------
C Michael Donoghue P.E., M.ASCE
Principal
Maritech Engr. ,Inc.
Austin TX
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-07-2017 03:37
From: Soussan Bathaee
Subject: Sustainability
Hi Michael,
Very impressive concept, you may want to have some one like me in your committee, for the R&D. I am in, if your are a person in the committee, you as a gentleman may like to have a Woman M.S., Scientist as structural engineer along side of your approach. Let me know, please.
Thank you for your thoughts.
Soussan Bathaee M. ASCE-SEI
Sent from my iPad