I assume that you mean the term in some form of the Tergaghi bearing capacity equation that accounts for the overburden or backfill above the footing bearing surface. If you are using some other method, the surcharge term may not apply.
As mentioned by others, considering the depth of the foundation below ground will increase the bearing capacity by accounting for the confinement the surcharge provides. However, a few caveats are in order. First, if your depth of "pad" foundation, measured from the bearing surface to the ground surface, is small relative to the width of the foundation, this calculation may not be worth the effort. The surcharge also must be present on each side of the foundation during loading. If <g class="gr_ gr_2559 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_inline_cards gr_disable_anim_appear Grammar only-ins doubleReplace replaceWithoutSep" id="2559" data-gr-id="2559">load</g> is present when the surcharge is not, you may have to consider that condition, as well. Unless the surcharge is seriously unbalanced, resulting in a potential stability failure, it is conservative to neglect it. In that sense, it is typically not "necessary" to consider.
------------------------------
Richard J. Driscoll P.E., M.ASCE
Lebanon NH
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-31-2017 15:28
From: Akintunde Alade
Subject: Surcharge
hello,
Is it necessary to consider surcharge height when designing for pad foundation