Hi Darrell,
Many of the NDT for timber structural assessment are useful where there is significant damage that is not visible. Unfortunately, for practicing engineers, these techniques are usually not very useful. Many owners want to know if there is any damage that can be proactively treated. Wood members have a high variablility (Coefficient of Variation, COV), on the order of 15% or more. So when we try to do Stress Wave Timing, we may also get a wide variability of readings from timber to timber, with 15% COV on top of any instrument variability. For the practicing engineer, to not know the true condition of the wood within say 20% of the NDS value is a major problem. These test rely on the MOE of the material showing some degradation. Decay is either small holes relative to the size of the member or a reduction in the cellulose content of the cell walls. A 5% degradation is hard to assess because the surrounding sound wood will still transmit the stress wave. Only when degradation is substantial, do these techniques show a reduction in MOE. By this point, the owner and engineer usually see other signs of problems such as large deflections or pre-buckling behavior. So to date, I have not found them useful in practice.
There is a regular Forest Products Society symposium on NDT: ndtesymposium.org
You may be able to obtain the proceedings from a local university library.
------------------------------
William Kirkham Ph.D. Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE
Director MCE Program
The University of Kansas
Overland Park KS
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-23-2019 14:15
From: Darrell Staaleson
Subject: NDT of Timber using Stress Wave Timing Fakopp
Does anyone have experience using Stress Wave Timing for NDT inspection of timber structures. I learned about this at an ASCE 2-day seminar on structural condition assessments. The procedure is outlined in "Wood and Timber Condition Assessment Manual - Second Edition" by USDA.
- Are there any case studies you found useful?
- I would like to know if you found the Fakopp device to be durable and reliable in the field. Are there any maintenance issues you have experienced?
- Do you think other equipment is better?
- I would also be interested in any other thoughts you have on this method.
------------------------------
Darrell Staaleson P.E., M.ASCE
Principal
Staaleson Engineering, P.C.
Covington WA
------------------------------