ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria Draft

Welcome! Please add your comments on the specific criteria in the individual numbered threads in the “Discussion” tab. The “17. General Comments” is reserved for comments that are not specific to a phrase or section of the criteria. Thanks!

Latest Discussion Posts

  • Professor Ivan, Thanks for your contributions to this discussion.  This is certainly a valid issue, but before we can discuss it, we need to ensure that we have the facts straight.  I can find no evidence that the term "natural science" has ever been ...

  • Here I posted the CM program criteria as one example of what that approach might look like.  I am familiar with CM's as this is part of the Durham School at UNL. Please note the broad statements prior to the list.  (personally, I am not advocating (or ...

  • Al, there are some alternatives to Bloom's Taxonomy, particularly in the non-cognitive domain.  However, that's not the key point I'm trying to make.  My key point is that I don't think the CE Program Criteria is the appropriate place publish this guidance.  ...

  • Jessica, I want to thank you for raising this issue. I share your concern. It is not clear to me what we can a curriculum can demonstrate that the students "apply" these principles. It seems to me that the people writing these criteria are not actually ...

  • I have another perspective on the "basic" versus "natural" science issue. It seems like this is at least the second time you are proposing to switch back and forth between basic and natural science. The last time you switched from "natural" back to "basic" ...

Upcoming Events List


Log in to see this information

Either the content you're seeking doesn't exist or it requires proper authentication before viewing.

Announcements

  • Welcome to the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Draft Forum

    Please click on the "Discussion" tab to join the discussion

Latest Shared Files